- unadviseddesper reblogged this from stoweboyd
- valueof34 likes this
- mildredbod8 likes this
- fitzpatrickyou834 likes this
- dominicanomaly reblogged this from emergentfutures
- dominicanomaly likes this
- meggsie likes this
- ariafrescapermage reblogged this from emergentfutures
- sefton-iris likes this
- gregor-robert likes this
- ummok likes this
- sbijlstra likes this
- ultimateontarioadventure likes this
- theskyislow likes this
- whatevers reblogged this from emergentfutures
- lame-ape likes this
- justinherrick likes this
- feed-well likes this
- emergentfutures reblogged this from stoweboyd
- kimberlyhg89 likes this
- denise55fr likes this
- ahandsomestark likes this
- This was featured in #Tech
- flyonair likes this
- shoutsandmumbles reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
- stoweboyd posted this
A great overview of how online, communitarian, open science sites are transforming the wold of science journals, and research.
Thomas Lin via NYTimes.com
The system is hidebound, expensive and elitist, they say. Peer review can take months, journal subscriptions can be prohibitively costly, and a handful of gatekeepers limit the flow of information. It is an ideal system for sharing knowledge, said the quantum physicist Michael Nielsen, only “if you’re stuck with 17th-century technology.”
Dr. Nielsen and other advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction.
Open-access archives and journals like arXiv and the Public Library of Science (PLoS) have sprung up in recent years. GalaxyZoo, a citizen-science site, has classified millions of objects in space, discovering characteristics that have led to a raft of scientific papers.
On the collaborative blog MathOverflow, mathematicians earn reputation points for contributing to solutions; in another math experiment dubbed the Polymath Project, mathematicians commenting on the Fields medalist Timothy Gower’s blog in 2009 found a new proof for a particularly complicated theorem in just six weeks.
And a social networking site called ResearchGate — where scientists can answer one another’s questions, share papers and find collaborators — is rapidly gaining popularity.
The web is subversive and corrosive to established power configurations, and now is the time for the scientific journal oligopoly to crash.