‘Open Science’ Challenges Journal Tradition With Web Collaboration - Thomas Lin via NYTimes.com


stoweboyd:

A great overview of how online, communitarian, open science sites are transforming the wold of science journals, and research.

Thomas Lin via NYTimes.com

The system is hidebound, expensive and elitist, they say. Peer review can take months, journal subscriptions can be prohibitively costly, and a handful of gatekeepers limit the flow of information. It is an ideal system for sharing knowledge, said the quantum physicist Michael Nielsen, only “if you’re stuck with 17th-century technology.”

Dr. Nielsen and other advocates for “open science” say science can accomplish much more, much faster, in an environment of friction-free collaboration over the Internet. And despite a host of obstacles, including the skepticism of many established scientists, their ideas are gaining traction.

Open-access archives and journals like arXiv and the Public Library of Science (PLoS) have sprung up in recent years. GalaxyZoo, a citizen-science site, has classified millions of objects in space, discovering characteristics that have led to a raft of scientific papers.

On the collaborative blog MathOverflow, mathematicians earn reputation points for contributing to solutions; in another math experiment dubbed the Polymath Project, mathematicians commenting on the Fields medalist Timothy Gower’s blog in 2009 found a new proof for a particularly complicated theorem in just six weeks.

And a social networking site called ResearchGate — where scientists can answer one another’s questions, share papers and find collaborators — is rapidly gaining popularity.

The web is subversive and corrosive to established power configurations, and now is the time for the scientific journal oligopoly to crash.

(via emergentfutures)

  1. unadviseddesper reblogged this from stoweboyd
  2. dominicanomaly reblogged this from emergentfutures
  3. magecian86 reblogged this from emergentfutures
  4. whatevers reblogged this from emergentfutures
  5. emergentfutures reblogged this from stoweboyd
  6. shoutsandmumbles reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
    Great article on how online, open science sites are tearing down the gate of science journals.
  7. stoweboyd posted this